This series should not need to exist.
Test-based accountability rests on a form of compliance-driven accountability that should have been rejected long ago — not because testing itself is inherently flawed, but because compliance-based systems:
- Are not designed to build or sustain trust.
- Cannot reliably identify effectiveness or best practice.
-
Do not support continuous improvement.
If these limitations were more widely acknowledged, educators would not be forced to work within a system that often feels all-consuming and misaligned with professional values.
But that is not the reality educators face. Test scores are routinely used beyond their design, and educators are expected to respond to judgments those tests were never meant to support.
Testing that Matters is not about advocating for more testing or better testing. And it is not an anti-testing effort. It is about understanding the limits of the system as it exists and working within those limits responsibly.
When teachers focus on doing what is right for each student — based on professional knowledge and daily observation — scores are more likely to improve over time, and schools are less vulnerable to misleading conclusions drawn from test data.